Access Now admit.org is only good for top ties pro-level live feed. Without any fees on our binge-watching paradise. Delve into in a sprawling library of curated content ready to stream in unmatched quality, essential for select viewing junkies. With hot new media, you’ll always never miss a thing. Discover admit.org is only good for top ties specially selected streaming in crystal-clear visuals for a totally unforgettable journey. Get into our viewing community today to feast your eyes on unique top-tier videos with 100% free, free to access. Appreciate periodic new media and explore a world of unique creator content intended for deluxe media enthusiasts. Don't forget to get special videos—start your fast download! Enjoy top-tier admit.org is only good for top ties singular artist creations with amazing visuals and editor's choices.

Nah top heavy is good for you, you have a better chance at a t30 interview than a mid tier because you’ll likely be yield protected Also stayed the same when i gave myself 600 research hours vs 0 research hours The only exception would be apply to all your state schools, and throw in state schools you have any ties to in any other states

Also mission fit is a good idea like others have said reply reply aydmuuye • One of my insecurities is number of clinical hours, so i kept all the other answers the same and varied the hours from 100 to 1000 and the admit score stayed exactly the same Your admit.org rankings have a few shakeups in the top 20s and a lot in the t50

N = 1 but it somehow predicted everywhere i got interviews at this cycle lol

I applied to 30 schools and got 4 interviews (1 reach, 2 targets, 1 baseline) so it worked for me I think msar only has matriculant data while admit.org has the accepted data, only some accepted people matriculate so the accepted number is more accurate. The best way to see it in action is to just try it with any combination of stats and ecs that you can think of and see how the school list and score changes. Any advice on the structure, people interviewing (faculty, admissions staff, and students), areas for questions, and whether the format is traditional, involves any team elements, and/or includes mmi elements

Thank you and good luck to all this cycle! I was playing around with admit.org since i've seen it mentioned, and i'm wondering what exactly it's based on/how reliable it is

OPEN